Is iTunes changing the way we read scripture?

For Christmas I received several gift certificates for iTunes. This makes me happy. I love new music. I have music playing all the time, in the car, in the office, and when I workout. iTunes is great because you can sample lots of new music and pick and choose what you like. I have realized that iTunes, with all of its advantages may be costing us something too, however, and that it relates to our ability to read scripture.

When you hear a single released by an artist it gives you a limited picture of that artist. It is only one sampling of their sound. Often a single is misleading. You miss an artists true sound by judging them through one song. I can think of any number of bands who made it big with one hit but had no lasting following because that wasn’t really their sound. Or, artists that have a long and storied history that would be totally missed by listening to only one song they have written.

There is also the reality of albums and how they are assembled. Some songs can simply stand alone, but most songs weren’t just created as singles, they were written as part of an album and to be fully appreciated they need to listened to in their context. Take for example the classic U2 album The Joshua Tree. For Christmas I received the 20th Anniversary remastered version of the album. 20 years later it still stands out as an amazing music achievement. U2 fans have been divided, however, for over 20 years because of the 4th song on the album, Bullet the Blue Sky. After the first three songs which are smooth, soulful, and melodic, Bullet the Blue Sky is jarring. Many fans have alway hated the song. (Including my friend Dave, I know because he and I have debated this before) Why after such an incredible beginning is this song there?

Bullet the Blue Sky is about the 1980’s US military intervention in El Salvador. When writing the song Bono told the Edge to put El Salvador through the amplifier. It is aggressive, political, and disharmonious. Adam Clayton the bass player plays in a different key than the rest of the band throughout the song. And yet, it is one of the bands favorite songs and has been played at almost every live concert the performed for 20 years. I saw them perform it on the Popmart and Vertigo tours.

I believe the song is placed where it is on The Joshua Tree because it is supposed to be jarring. It is a song of protest. It’s placement emphasizes the disharmony and aggression, especially in comparison to With or Without You that precedes it.

When we listen to music outside of its context, there is a level of understanding and connection that is really lost from it. The same is true of scripture. Scripture is so accessible to us today. You can just type in a reference into a box on your browser and it pops right up. We don’t have to work to take the scripture and use it. But, the ease of access is also robbing us the ability to understand it.

Without context scripture makes no sense. Proof texting is a frequent reality in worship and preaching within evangelicalism particularly. We take a verse, pull it out of its context, ignore who said it, and make it say what we want it to say. Quite often we go to scripture looking for a verse that backs up what we want to say. That is irresponsible when it comes to understanding the Word of God.

Take Jeremiah 29:11 one of the most misused verses from scripture. We love this verse because it says, “For I know the plans I have for you,” declares the LORD, “plans to prosper you and not to harm you, plans to give you hope and a future.” This is a great verse, full of hope and promise. We read it and we just smile at our lives that God is planning out for us so that we can prosper exactly like we want to.

Jeremiah wrote this verse to slaves living in Babylonian captivity. If you read the immediate context you will find that God’s plans for deliverance take another 80 years to complete. The good news God delivered to these exiles was for their grandchildren. How many of us hear that and think about that when we read this verse.

Our instant gratification and the constant availability of information taken out of context is robbing us of hard earned understanding and appreciation. It is true of music, and it is true of scripture. So enjoy your iTunes, find some music you like, but if you really like a song, buy the album and get to know it. Do the same with scripture. Don’t read verses, read chapters and books and entire libraries by particular authors if you want to understand and to breath scripture. We must not take the shortcuts, without the work, we reduce the value of that which we claim to love.

Explore posts in the same categories: Faith, Music

8 Comments on “Is iTunes changing the way we read scripture?”

  1. Maggie Says:

    American Christians seem to be good at missing the big picture. We are great at looking for an “easy button” of faith because of the reality of our own captivity.

    It is interesting that the promise for the future told in Jeremiah’s letter is made in light of the people’s past disobedience. How did they end up in exile? They didn’t trust God.

    And the cycle continues today…

  2. Chris Says:

    I really don’t hold iTunes responsible for that proof-texting tendency…but I see your point. Thanks for the history on the U2 song. I’m a quasi-fan but didn’t know that story.

    We’ve been taking scriptures out of context quite freely since they were first uttered/written!

    But we’re definitely a sound-bite culture with no time for the unabridged version of anything. Thanks for the reminder.

  3. gregarthur Says:

    I certainly don’t hold iTunes responsible either. It is more of a symptom than a cause.

  4. Shannon Says:

    That’s probably one of the biggest things that I learned in my class on Matthew is the importance of context and how the verses surrounding the verse you are looking at are important to understanding the verse. Today’s Christians are too quick to drop a verse, sort of like name dropping, without really understanding the full context of what the writer and God is attempting to convey in the passage.

    See you soon (as in a few hours soon!)

  5. John Says:

    You are right that the christians we view as christians do that quite often. But you also got to understand that a Pastor would rather give people hope than to turn it down. Now what they don’t realize is this. If they read the context that it didn’t happen for years to come and giving someone hope and that hope is delinquished when what they hope for isn’t achieved when the congregation wants it.

    Did you get what I said? I think I got toungue twisted. How can I put it easy? Pastors give hope because they feel that is there obligation and calling. They leave out portions to do this. THen the congregations hope dwindles because it was a false hope because the prosperity didn’t come for years on end.

    Is that better?

    This is why I like John 14-16 Now I said chapters so this isn’t a typo. John 14-16 can some up the entire book because it reviews the whole thing. Yet as you said there are still many things left out but I can live off of John 14-16 because of a verse in that passage says if we abide in Christ and he in us and we in the father. Then what ever we petition for will be given. Now remember if Christ is abiding in us do you thing for one second our petition would be for a new T.V? NO NO NO! If Christ is in us we pray the petitions Christ would have prayed. Pkus we would Love like Christ Loved…

    Now people take that GOd will give us the desires of our hearts but they always neglect ” If you remain in Christ…” People like there flesh too much to remain in God and that is why you don’t see God work that much miracles. Plus we put God in a time box. If God can’t work in an hour and 45 minutes then we don’t want that church. What happened to good ol’ wait on God?

    WAIT ON GOD

    WAIT ON GOD

    WAIT ON GOD

    WAIT ON GOD…

    What A concept…

  6. Shay Says:

    It seems to me that the preacher’s job is to communicate the gospel. (Duh, right?) What does that mean? I think it means encouraging then challenging then encouraging then challenging. It’s getting people to look up to God and be encouraged and then to look around at others and be challenged to love them. It’s an upward cycle of love and holiness! The hope is that God’s Kingdom is here. The challenge is that God’s Kingdom is yet to come and we are to facilitate that coming. The hope is that Christ is risen. The challenge is that he is coming back. The hope is that there IS hope. The challenge is that we might have to wait for it.

  7. yesarepetsde Says:

    ibm vacant boy look free english water day england green english

  8. revcoolaspooh Says:

    A phrase that has always stuck with me is “A text without a Context can be a Subtext for anything”. Throughout church history people have manipulated the sacred text for their own devices. The sacred scriptures need to be defended and cherished.


Comment: